Theres one thing he doesnt understandhis terrible and fantastic night-terrors. He was cloned from an old gunfighter, and he seems to continue that trait. Sandman and he has a propensity for being very evil. (let me save you the click to ) Genesis Protocol: Dawn of a New Era Like I said, good time to go to OFTC or Libera if ya'll aren't with it. rasengan: go fuck yourself you pathetic little worm unknown_lamer: There's still time for rasengan to revert this decision. what a pathetic little ratfucker who has to get off on destroying I hope rasegan chokes on a pretzel, 20y 29w and I'm out, what a total efnet would be the best home for new freenode rasengan: are you planning to merge new freenode with Rizon? JohnMH: Within 48 hours, it will be clear. rasengan: Where there's no *benefit*, there's no reason to abandon the existing. rasengan: There's no *benefit* to new services though. A migration path is definitely better than this. dead: We could have mirated, it's not hard. rasengan: hey man i will migrate those nickserv/chanserv databases for you for
#Irc quotes database free
rasengan: The IRCd was already Free Software, and is the best choice for a large JohnMH: You will see, that it was required. rasengan: You don't need to change the IRCd to do that. JohnMH: To bring the real FOSS community back. rasengan: What's the motivation behind moving to a new IRCd? rasengan: Are sponsors pulling out? That's the only explanation I can think of for this. But we can't guarantee for how long that 'awhile' is. Later on: freenode classic will be around for awhile. I've deleted most of the surrounding messages, unless essential for context. "Giant projects centrally controlled by a select few" is not FOSS. ptx0: It is your prerogative, we will miss you. rasengan: yo instead of using libera i'll probably just leave IRC altogether, good job For the rest, we patiently await you in the new freenode. This is an opportunity for everyone here to go to libera! See you all in the future! The new freenode! rasengan: that sounds like gaslighting to me been here supporting the removal of prev staff but you just keep doing things freenode was destroyed by the former staff. and you can't even explain why you're doing it? And in any case, it's mostly place for the dev team, so when the dev team decided, there wasn't really room for any more discussion. I don't know, in my experience, the network doesn't really matter, and users who visit us on IRC are mostly either outsiders or they can move too - we haven't had a single person stating they would prefer to stay on Freenode, even at the beginning. Basically Lee and his admin staff was under an impression that there is a separate entity "freenode community of a project" - which you can see in the way they handled the first round of hijacking of the channels (redirecting to offtopic # channels instead of letting them be redirected by the topic to another network - as if users wanted to stay on freenode instead, I dunno, talk to developers and project members.). There was also lots of talk about "fracturing communities" even though if a project moves to a different channel, the community will follow, it's not a big deal since most clients can handle multiple networks. This has quite a lot of half-truths and lies of omissions too: Īlso this: - "We have defeated BIG FOSS", "Their reign on FOSS has come to an end" etc. At the same time, there was evidence for things that were not like Lee painted them to be (for example why he closed the ~700 channels, there was only one known channel that kicked out their members, most others just had "libera.chat" in the title). Or that anyone is being "forced" to move or "canceled" for wanting their project to stay on freenode I mean, sure it could've happened, but there was no evidence of that. For example that projects are leaving not because they decided to leave, but because they were infiltrated? Or that the "vocal minority" is saying that they moved but they didn't really move.
0 kommentar(er)
